« Safarik running? Jordan a Dem again? | Main | End the dance with Wheelabrator »

Where's the justice, Judge Hara?

David Finley was by all accounts a good guy, a family man with ties to the community and his church. More than 90 people who know him wrote letters asking Judge Glenn Hara to give him probation after his conviction for being a big-time commercial marijuana grower at his Volcano ranch.

Finley had already spent 14 months in jail and forfeited $85,000 while the case was being prosecuted. First-time offenders like Finley often get probation.

Another drug offender, Charles Rosecrans, was searched before boarding a flight to Oahu and was found to have nearly an ounce of cocaine concealed in his pants and about 100 pills, Xanax and Darvocet, in his luggage. Rosecrans said he was going to Oahu "to party."

Rosecrans has a "history of DUIs" and four prior convictions, Deputy Prosecutor Jason Skier told Judge Hara. In February 2007, Rosecrans was sentenced to 20 years in prison for second- degree promotion of a dangerous drug and first-degree promotion of a harmful drug, a class A felony.

But earlier this month Rosecrans went back back before Judge Hara for resentencing, just a few days before Finley appeared in Hara's court for sentencing.

There was no flood of letters from the community attesting to Charles Rosecrans’ character or calling for leniency from the court -- at least none reported.

No one said David Finley was a danger to the community, as Skier had described Rosecrans:

My concerns, at the time of (Rosecrans') initial sentencing, and at the time of his resentencing was the amount of drugs. He has a history of DUIs. He's been convicted four times. He is somebody that has an untreated drug problem, and driving around. Somebody like that is a danger to the community.

Yet it was Finley, 65, who was given two 20-year prison terms and Rosecrans (no age given) who got probation.

In Finley's case, Judge Glenn Hara said it was not easy for him and he spoke for several minutes about how marijuana is "entrenched in our island way of life," the Tribune-Herald reported. And while acknowledging the public debate on marijuana's place in society, Hara said to Finley:

I know you really regret what you did. But we have these laws ... Any sentence other than prison will undermine the community's respect for these laws. The only thing they will hear is 'probation.'

Well, now, after Charles Rosecrans' resentencing, all I hear is "probation" and I’m also hearing the word “travesty.”

How can this gross sentencing inequity instill greater respect for the law? Doesn't probation for cocaine, DUI and multiple repeat offenses also undermine the community's respect for these laws?  Does Judge Hara really think Finley’s marijuana farm was worse for society than Rosecrans’ dangerous record?

On a different level, does it make sense to fill another long-term prison bed with the likes of David Finley while letting Charles Rosecrans off on probation? What a crazy world when the good family man goes to prison and the dangerous party guy gets a big break.

Do you feel any safer tonight?

Posted on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 08:41PM by Registered CommenterHunter Bishop in , | Comments12 Comments | References3 References

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (3)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    how to pass a drug test
  • Response
    Pass USA provides the latest drug passing products and information on the market. Our extensive products range from hair, saliva, blood, urine, and complete body detoxifications, along with knowledgeable customer service members that will help you along the way for a successful and painless natural procedure for passing your upcoming drug ...
  • Response
    ...

Reader Comments (12)

You ask 'do I feel any better', and I say hell man I am scared sh*tless.. of our government! Who by their (the judicial branch) example condone violence while wasting very valuable resources on something they fear, but is non-the-less harmless to our community. The cost, i.e., the time given, to David is so much more than the worst hardened violent criminals get that one has to wonder what is the motive behind Judge Hara's lame excuse for 'throwing the book' at David. I suspect there is a lot of politics at play here. Does the prosecutor get some bennies from the feds for keeping the case 'high profile'? Don't they, and the police department make a substantial share of the proceeds from any forfeiture earnings? And what example is being set? That we as a community do not care for the welfare of our citizens. For David's wife, children, and grandchildren? That we have no means other than to just 'lock them up' when a member of our society strays from some culturally defined line to an extend that it displeases the norm? I tell you, I am all for the 'lock them up and throw away the key' method when someone proves they are violent and unable to be rehabilitated, but to destroy Davids life, and the lives of his family is a crime itself. And, one I am sorry will go unpunished.
April 27, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterdakine
Good commentary Hunter. I completely agree with you. I also question where is the justice in the sentencing in the both these situations.
April 27, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterAaron Stene
One should not forget, the last time Prosecutor Kimura was challenged in an election was many years ago when Hara was rejected by voters.

Glenn is a bright and able attorney but not about to be lenient in the courtroom. That should be weighed the next time a career prosecutor is appointed to the bench

Given the age and reputation of Mr. Finley, one would think he might ne treated more like Mr. Kenoi, the mayoral candidate, was when he messed up and was given the porverbial second chance.

I suggest you read the Jim Quirk piece today in WHT on the four main mayoral candidates and their times in the courtroom. It is a pretty fair and balanced piece for WHT
April 27, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterhugh clark
Hunter,
Well written article.

Regardless of a persons liberal or conservative position on
the sentencing of drug dealers it does seem that a 40 year jail sentence in the case of David Finley seems biased.




April 28, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterAnon

The Judicial system is certainly the weak link in the chain.
It is also the most difficult to change, with no democratic elections.
The Executive and the Legislative branch, however, are allegedly held accountable at by democratic elections.

What can be done with voters' initiative or referendum?
For example, regarding sentencing guidelines for violent crimes and previous violent offenders, versus nonviolent?

Prison?
...lock bad boys in a prison cell and they become mean men.
...schackle bad boys to hard labor and they earn some self respect, as well as sleep better at night...


"...ashame' to live in a land, where justice is a game..."
Bob Dylan
April 28, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterJames Weatherford
I hope the Paroling Authority makes the right choice on a minimum term. What's wrong with our system when a person can beat a family member and it's a misdemeanor with a mandatory two days jail while Mr. Finley gets prison? He broke the law and should be held accountable but two 20 year sentences is beyond excessive.
April 28, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterali
Many years ago (43, to be exact) I wrote a Master's Thesis at UH Manoa on criminal sentencing. Since that time I never criticize local judges for their sentencing practices. That is because the judge has access to a great deal of information that is confidential, and while it is available to prosecution and defense, it is not available to the public. In addition to a comprehensive social study, the Presentence Investigation often contains aggravating and mitigating circumstance of the specific offense with which the defendant is charged as well as a recommendation with respect to sentencing. While Mr. Finley may well be a good citizen and well-liked in the community, he nevertheless grew and processed commercial quantities of marijuana and its byproducts after having been arrested for the same offense. This can only be explained as greed and stupidity. In adddition, as James Weatherford points out, it is the paroling authority, not the judge, which decides the actual amount of time a person will be incarcerated. Mr. Finley is highly unlikely to spend anything close to 20 years in prison.
April 30, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRick Castberg
Pre-senetncing reports are interesting. I inspected several dozen (before Riki May Amano placed them off limits for reasons never disclosed). They are, however, sometimes incomplete, can be biased for or against the defendant and frequently contain errors only sometimes corrected at sentencing. Better than nothing but quite imperfect.
April 30, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterhugh clark
I'm surprised no one mentioned the other drugs found at Finley's house in this raid, or the fact that he was arrested with loads of plants in another marijuana raid in 06. The guy DIDN'T show any respect for the law, and to allow him to get away with it DOES undermine the law. Hara was right.

The problem isn't that Finley's sentence was too harsh. The problem was that Rosecrans got off too easy. If Hara means what he says about respect for the law, he should show it by sending Rosecrans back for his 20 the first time Rosecrans misses an appointment with his PO or fails a urine test (and I don't think we will have to wait long for that dirty UA).

Hara owes that bit of justice to Finley, and to the rest of us who will pay for Finley's incarceration. If you're going to send a message, judge, make it loud and clear. Make it fair.
April 30, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterLawless?
I'm sure he's a 'nice' guy. But his indignant supporters should stop portraying him as St. David who just sold some pot to a few folks. He also had a crapload of methadone ... Was Finley an ex-Heroin addict? If not, why have the methadone.

I'm tired of for-profit drug sellers being portrayed as martyrs. It's a business of "peace," "love," and greed. And people die on occasion. No biggie, I suppose, if it advances he 'cause' of hemp.

http://www.spokesmanreview.com/local/story.asp?ID=220416
May 3, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterAnon
I hate to say it, because I am not a reactionary by any means, but when I worked as a prison educator here it became clear to me that the men I worked with were pretty serious offenders. They weren't just people who made little mistakes; their offenses were seriousm and flagrant, and they had offended many many times. The picture may be different on the Mainland, but this, as they say, ain't the Mainland.
May 3, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterHattie
Before this recession is over you may see a lot of family men involved in selling pot. It seems the least damaging and the profits seem easy enough until you get caught. If a man is faced with feeding his family or running pot he'll do just what was done during prohibition. Methadone is a schedule III violation the court can't show much mercy there. Bias under the law is nothing new.
May 8, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBrian

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.