Commentary,
Community SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 7
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 6
Lava lake on Halemaumau floor click here
Charter schools director quits click here
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 5
Mayoral candidates tackle issues click here
Lava pics click here
Eruption update click here
Hawaii Volcanoes National Park click here
The 'best-connected journalist' in Puna.
-- Hawaii Island Journal
I was a reporter for close to 17 years at the Hawaii Tribune-Herald until October 2005, when I joined the growing ranks of union leaders now formerly employed by the newspaper. (For more about what's happening at the Tribune-Herald, check out the Hawaii Newspaper Guild web site.) Since then I've been the Hilo unit representative for the Guild, a freelance writer, photographer, and blogger. Puna has been my family's home since 1993.
Saturday, September 22, 2007 at 08:55AM Chunkster makes a good observation deserving a response. Why when I wrote the story about the Hawaii Tribune-Herald employee did I include the fact that Isaac Nahakuelua is a Native Hawaiian?
Right or wrong, like it or not, race is nearly an unavoidable topic in Hawaii. Without venturing into the question of what constitutes a race of people, you can’t deny that many important issues in Hawaii are framed by the experience of those who first settled these islands.
Even though readers may have guessed at Isaac Nahakuelua's’s ancestry from his name, there was no photograph and even that might be inconclusive. I don’t like to leave readers guessing when I write and I’ve learned over the years of both reading and writing that attention to detail is valuable to a reader. So I included it in the story.
Now, Chunkster is right that no one is claiming discrimination in what the newspaper did to Nahakuelua because he’s Native Hawaiian. But no one is claiming he’s being discriminated because of his age, either, yet I also included that in the story. It’s simply the kind of detail that gives the reader a better sense of the person and his station in life.
But now you may be asking, if my subject were a Caucasian named Smith, would I have made the point to write that he was Caucasian? Probably not.
The reason is that whatever you think of race, the fate of Native Hawaiians as a group in Hawaii has been an important issue since Captain Cook set foot on the Big Island. And over time Native Hawaiians collectively have been relegated to the bottom of the socio-economic ranks in our society, which is a shame that all of us live with today and one that many still are struggling to rectify.
So when a young Native Hawaiian, whose prospects for success are dimmed at birth by the nature of his ancestry, I think it significant to mention the fact that he is Native Hawaiian when obstacles are placed in his path whether they are the direct result of racial discrimination or not.
I hope this lends some insight into the thought process behind what I wrote and my thanks to Chunkster for encouraging me to think a little more critically about it. As always, I welcome your comments.
Reader Comments (7)
Sometimes,"full" information can (at least seem to) be "too much" information.
What's so special about this war veteran being Native Hawaiian? There is a long tradition of 'local boys' from this community and others going to war just so they can get a leg up, including an education (...been there, done that).
Young people from the tough end of the economic spectrum -- Native Hawaiian, plantation camp nisei, sharecropper's spore, or whoever it is in serious need of economic opportunity -- are used as canon fodder. The big difference now is that 'local girls' are also allowed to be mercenaries.
retaliation by a jerk supervisor. But you are right, most of us Native Hawaiians haven't been thriving very well under the American way of life. We lost everything when we lost our language.
It would still be wrong if he wasn't Native Hawaiian.
Obviously not the case here, but I certainly see Chunksters view.
http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/N07/498/30/PDF/N0749830.pdf?OpenElement